The most mundane but everyday architecture such as that of our houses. The functional needs and limitations imposed by space light and climate have long given practically correct and consequently never ugly solutions. The old houses were nice because the builder started from the inside out. In other words he was trying to satisfy the functional needs from which the external volumes arose. And every change of acquired dimensions and volumes had to be imposed to be justified. The attempt to add the dimension of beautiful of elegance is what started to give us the bad things. Something similar happens with the way people dress. Work clothes are never bad. On the contrary Sunday or wedding clothes reveal people’s embarrassment when trying to consciously choose something nice. But the history of clothing is written through Sunday clothes. From striving for nice. It is possible that akalesthesia in humans is an acquired kousuri. But it is for this reason an element of cultural evolution. And an element that gives freedom to the human will since only of elegance as a choice.
Perhaps freedom would open the door to a new style
The Greek State cannot of course understand the importance of this freedom. Probably believing that it is doing the right thing confuses the restrictions imposed for the respect and safety of third parties. The whole with those that touch the aesthetic freedom of the people. Man has a right E-Commerce Photo Editing Service to ugliness because he seeks beauty. For this reason all urban planning restrictions which were established with the aim. The aesthetic guidance of the Greek architectural landscape and Greek architects are paranoid and oxymoron based on a supposedly common aesthetic perception which does not exist. An architectural tradition which must be in development. Are houses that have been based on these rules for years more beautiful. Does the committee that checks the architectural result from an aesthetic point of view necessarily consist of better architects. Than those who made them Are not all the monstrous ugliness that adorns the islands the countryside. The cities conforming to the dictates of all committees Why shouldn’t people be free with their neighbors.
The consciousness of the unsightly allows the existence
After all the aesthetic choice must be the sole responsibility of the one who will live. The house and the one who will design it which is again a choice of the former. But even these illfated architects should be given freer rein in the design of the akalesthesia because only Bold Data in this way can the one bold. Imaginative one spring up among them who will bring something new interesting and beautiful. Perhaps freedom has slowly very slowly developed an awareness of personal choice and responsibility. Perhaps freedom would open the door to a new style adapted to new needs. And after all we would know that the achalasia that surrounds us is at least the product of personal choices and not the result of compliance with urban planning restrictions. Adapted to new needs. And after all we would know that the achalasia that surrounds us is at least the product of personal choices and not the result of compliance with urban planning restrictions. Perhaps freedom would open the door to a new style adapted to new needs. And after all we would know that the achalasia that surrounds us is at least.